
Back to Recruitment News index
London, 16th July 2009
In their recent tax review Ernst and Young explore the question of whether corporates should be looking hard at the cost of the tax function or the tax cost of the business.
For a large number of organizations, this year has brought significant headcount reductions within Group functions. However, does it make sense for companies to adopt this strategy within tax? Definitely not - but why is this the case?
The tax function can lower the tax cost and thus generate cash by reducing or deferring taxable income and by increasing or accelerating deductions. Anti-avoidance legislation means that all tax planning requires a valid commercial rationale. As a result of the economic conditions, corporates are undergoing restructurings and reorganisations that provide significant opportunities for tax planning. EY also point out that tax authorities around the globe are reforming tax laws in light of the global recession.
Surely all this means that the tax department will be even more stretched in months to come?
We are in a position where the tax function is under increasing pressure and yet is often unable to recruit the resource it needs.
Maven Partners believe that we will see an increased demand for experienced tax interim professionals who can come in and add value to the cash tax position of the company.
Rob Stephenson is a Managing Partner at Maven Partners, a specialist tax recruitment business.
robstephenson@mavenpartners.co.uk
+44 (0)20 3178 8847